|
|
The VTS Difference
Boosting performance by building on what comes naturally
In just ten VTS lessons, spaced over a school year:
• All kids grow
in thinking and language skills, visual literacy, and confidence.
Research
shows VTS is especially
effective with kids who struggle to learn.
• VTS is effective
across cultural and language groups, and works well with students
who
are challenged in
many different ways.
• VTS addresses
discrepancies in experience and exposure created by poverty and
disadvantage, significantly
leveling the field.
• Teachers gain
new skills at facilitating discussions, ones they transfer to other
lessons,
affecting student
performance to an even greater degree.
• Teacher and
student morale improves as learning proves engaging for all.
• Students master
complex skills extremely hard to teach. Elusive "higher level" standards
are met.
• Test scores
improve, especially given questions involving images, reasoning, remembering
details, and drawing
inferences.
• Dynamics among
teachers shift, and a more collaborative environment is created.
• VTS is cost
effective. Materials are inexpensive, the training regime for teachers
efficient.
The VTS effect.
Sucessful schools demand that all kids succeed, and not just in basic
skills. Our world requires people who can think, express themselves,
create, and work together. VTS instills these abilities because it
builds on kids' inherent strengths and on art's capacity to stimulate.
And because it provides the right challenges at the right time.
...practitioners
of (VTS) are able to help students become remarkably competent
visual and critical thinkers... I have watched children develop
remarkably sophisticated vocabulary skills, and I have seen
them apply these skills... in their writing and in their ability
to understand and analyze the world around them.
- Deborah Schwartz, former Vice Director for Education, Brooklyn
Museum of Art |
|
The San Antonio Story
In a three-year project with what was labeled an "at risk" population
of low income, largely Hispanic students, VUE studied the effects
of VTS on visual literacy and critical thinking. In the test site,
all students had VTS taught by their classroom teachers. Another San
Antonio elementary school was used as a control and its students were
not exposed to VTS. The second school was matched in demographics
and ethnicity, but had a smaller percentage of kids considered "at
risk" of failure and more who had a command of English, the second
language for most in both schools. In the tests given before the program
began, the second school actually scored higher.
At the end of three years, the differences were arresting. Even though
the control students started out ahead, the kids in the VTS school
significantly outperformed them in both areas, growth in visual thinking
skills and in thinking. VUE researchers counted untis of critical
thought and, against the odds, the experimental kids had double the
numbers off those with no VTS. Even more surprising, the academically
challenged San Antonio students also surpassed - by a similar margin
- the performance of students in a middle class, white, rural community
in Minnesota where VUE has just completed a five-year study.
In other words, the benefits of VTS for poor kids who came to school
speaking a language other than English and who were performing poorly
on test were profound. VTS was shown to dramatically improve their
thinking skills in time to support academic success, in part because
of their increased confidence. The data convinced the San Antonio
Independent School District to implement VTS system-wide.
Although it is less acknowledged, visual literacy is essential to
this increasingly image-dominated world, especially when images are
used to manipulate. The capacity of kids with VTS experience to read
a range of meaning in images greatly increases their ability to negotiate
everything from art to ads.
Still under study is the impact of VTS on language. VUE is in the
process of collecting data to document changes in writing cited repeatedly
by teachers. Preliminary findings suggest that the boost to language
will be similarly deep. |
|