|
How VTS Works
Background and Research
VTS is one of the most respected art education teaching methods
in the country, frequently cited at professional conferences. The
VTS method is utilized in dozens of art museums and schools across
the country and in Europe.
VTS is the
result of collaboration between cognitive psychologist Abigail
Housen and veteran museum educator Philip Yenawine. For
over 30 years, Abigail Housen, a Harvard-trained
educator and psychologist, has conducted empirical research exploring
how viewers, experienced and novice, think when looking at art
objects. Philip Yenawine, former Director
of Education at MOMA and NAEA Museum Educator of the Year (2000),
has taught and implemented VTS in urban and rural settings, with
disadvantaged populations, and across languages and cultures.
VTS was field
tested for over twelve years in many sites in the US and abroad
and is the subject of much independent research. Research
findings are detailed in reports and articles (www.visualthinkingstrategies.org).
Developing Thinking
Most thinking—indeed
most knowledge—begins with observations that form the
basis for ideas later given shape in language. VTS builds
habits of
- Making complex observations—continuously
adding breadth and depth
- Drawing conclusions, making inferences and interpretations
based on observation
- Expressing and articulating these ideas in discussions
and in writing
- Citing evidence to back up interpretations,
a thinking skill known as evidential reasoning: ‘I
think this because…’
- Considering a range of possibilities;
being able to brainstorm, to accept multiple viewpoints,
to speculate, and to use qualifying language: ‘It could be this.’ Or ‘It
might be that.’
- Revising: ‘At first I thought, but now
I think…’
- Elaborating: ‘What I meant was…’
- Applying these habits to other
subjects without prompting
Students find it easy to imagine transferring
the VTS questions to many contexts, inside and outside of school,
and in fact report that they do so. Almost all of the connections
they mention seem appropriate.
- Harvard University's Project Zero analysis of the Museum of Modern Art New
York School Program |

|
Building cognigiton through art
Infants start using their eyes to learn as soon as they open
them. They observe everything and gradually make sense of what
they see.
- VTS asks students to apply these intrinsic visual skills.
- VTS asks questions everyone can answer but still challenges
students to observe and think deeply.
- Intrigued by images and aided by supportive teachers, students
find language to express complicated ideas and emotions.
- Students develop a wide range of visual memories invaluable
in reading.
- Students put their minds together, building
on each other’s
observations, ideas, and knowledge. They learn to listen, argue
respectfully, and find more solutions together. They hone skills
as individuals who communicate easily within a group.
- Students apply these abilities—observing carefully, thinking
deeply, expressing themselves, listening to others—to other
subjects.
Why Art?
Thinking about art, or aesthetic thought, is rich and
complex.
The VTS curriculum is comprised of works of art and put into careful
order (as one might select books for young readers) to give students
a chance to use what they know to figure out what they don’t.
- Art’s subjects cover age-old stories often
addressing universal human concerns and conditions.
- Art’s subjects transcend economic and
cultural boundaries.
- Art is intentionally ambiguous, open to a variety of valid
interpretations.
- Feelings are embedded in art along with information, triggering
a full range of expression from those who look at it thoughtfully.
- Layers of meaning, symbols, and metaphor encourage probing
and reflecting in young people, as they do in adults.
|